Clinical Evidence · Erectile Dysfunction

What the PDE5 inhibitor trials actually show

Sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, and avanafil, synthesized in one place: the cleanest evidence base of any category CitedRx covers, with no compounding ambiguity and nearly three decades of post-marketing safety data.

Last reviewed: September 2026 · See the provider scores →
The short answer: sildenafil (Viagra) and tadalafil (Cialis) are both FDA-approved PDE5 inhibitors with strong trial evidence and decades of real-world safety data. Sildenafil's effective window is roughly 4-5 hours; tadalafil's much longer half-life (~17.5 hours) extends its window to up to 36 hours and supports an FDA-approved once-daily low-dose option. A 2024 meta-analysis of over 1.2 million men found PDE5 inhibitor use associated with lower cardiovascular risk and mortality, not merely a neutral safety profile.

The trial landscape

DrugApprovedKey findingSource
Sildenafil (Viagra) 1998 Pivotal trials (21 placebo-controlled studies, 3,000+ patients): 69% of intercourse attempts successful on sildenafil vs. 22% on placebo; mean IIEF erectile-function score rose from 15 to 22.4-25.0 depending on dose, vs. 16.6 for placebo.
Tadalafil (Cialis) 2003 Integrative analysis of 5 RCTs; 81% of patients on 20mg reported improved erections at 12 weeks. Half-life ~17.5 hours (vs. sildenafil's ~4), giving an effective window of up to 36 hours. Once-daily low-dose (2.5mg/5mg) approved 2008.
Vardenafil (Levitra) 2003 Same drug class and mechanism; less commonly prescribed today but remains FDA-listed as not withdrawn for safety or effectiveness reasons.
Avanafil (Stendra) 2012 The first new ED drug approved in nearly a decade at the time; positioned as faster-onset. Least commonly prescribed of the four today.
Class-wide safety 2024 meta-analysis 16 studies, >1.2 million subjects, median follow-up 4.3 years: PDE5 inhibitor use associated with lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality, not merely neutral. Nitrate co-use remains contraindicated.

The 69%/22% sildenafil figure is drawn from a secondary review citing the original pivotal trial data; we recommend treating it as high-confidence but secondary-sourced pending direct access to the original 1998 publication.

Sildenafil vs. placebo, visualized

Sildenafil% of intercourse attempts successful
69%
22%
Sildenafil Placebo

What this means in plain language

Both drugs work: duration is the real choice

Sildenafil and tadalafil show similar efficacy in trials. The practical decision isn't "which works better," it's "which duration fits your life": sildenafil's shorter window suits planned use, tadalafil's much longer window (and daily option) suits spontaneity.

Generic isn't a downgrade

Unlike compounded GLP-1s, FDA-approved generic sildenafil and tadalafil are the exact same drug tested in the pivotal trials, made by a different (FDA-regulated) manufacturer. Compounded ED products (custom doses, combination pills, flavored chewables) are a genuinely different category, not individually FDA-reviewed.

The cardiovascular fear is largely outdated

Early PDE5 inhibitor safety data was mixed and fueled lingering hesitancy. The 2024 meta-analysis of over a million men found the opposite of a risk signal: lower cardiovascular events and mortality in PDE5 inhibitor users. The one real, unchanged contraindication is concurrent nitrate use.

Decision framework

Your priorityWhat the evidence supports
Spontaneity, not planning around a doseTadalafil: its ~36-hour window is the trial-supported differentiator.
Lowest cost / most generic historySildenafil has the longest generic track record, typically the cheapest option.
Daily, low-dose option instead of as-neededTadalafil has an FDA-approved once-daily 2.5mg/5mg regimen.
Cardiovascular safety concernsThe 2024 meta-analysis (>1.2M subjects) is reassuring for the class: still avoid if taking nitrates.

How this should shape which provider you choose

Every provider on our rankings page offering FDA-approved sildenafil or tadalafil (brand or generic) is dispensing the exact product tested in the trials above. Compounded products (custom combination doses, flavored chewables) are not individually FDA-reviewed, even when built on the same active ingredients. In September 2025, the FDA issued a warning letter to BlueChew's parent company specifically over claims that its compounded products contain the "same active ingredients" as brand drugs, finding that framing misleading.

FDA-Approved Dispenses the exact FDA-approved drug (brand or generic): the trial evidence above applies directly.

Sources

See how providers score

8 ED telehealth providers, scored out of 10 on evidence match, rating, pricing transparency, and regulatory standing.

View the scores

CitedRx is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with the telehealth providers or drug manufacturers it reviews. Trial results are summarized from the publications cited above. This page is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice: talk to a licensed clinician about whether any medication is appropriate for you. CitedRx may earn a referral fee if you sign up with a provider through a link on this site; this does not affect how trial evidence is characterized on this page.